Wednesday, September 30, 2009

The Humans Are Dead, But There Are Jackalopes Now! Let's Read _After Man_!



I'll warn you right away, my nostalgia filter may be strong with this one. Indeed, you may run into many science fiction fans / armchair biologists / creature designers / ect. around my age whose young minds were permanently blown by Dougal Dixon's After Man. The New Dinosaurs, in hindsight,
might actually be better, but I find it very hard to have many bad things to say about After Man and it's various creatures. As the delightfully named Caustic Cover Critic says, the book is "deeply odd and quite fascinating."

After Man
was first published in 1981 (and the creatures were likely invented well before that, so take the science with a grain of salt), but I first learned about it through one of the Museum of Science's stranger traveling exhibitions. It was called "Future Zoo" and it was essentially a walk-through version of the book, with paintings on display, sculptures and animations of the animals, and even a robotic Desert Leaper (a la those wonderful traveling robotic dinosaur exhibits). Sadly, there does not appear to be any information about it online, so I have to go by my foggy memories. The exhibit was really the first work of hard science fiction that spoke to me as a child, and once I learned there was a book I HAD to have it.

Flash-forward nearly
ten, maybe even fifteen years to the frabjous day when I spot this, totally randomly, in a random gift shop:


 

Now of course I bought this on the spot. All told, I've only seen two copies of this book in person. Sadly, they were both incredibly cheaply bound softcovers. Before I start giving you the tour through the book and post more pictures, I need to show you what condition my copy is in now:


 

Illustration by Gary Marsh. Talk about loved to death. Long out of print, Dixon's books are notoriously hard to find nowadays and known copies tend to be expensive. Here's the Amazon link if you'd like to try your luck.
 

Anyway, the introduction of the book serves mainly as a refresher course of basic evolutionary biology. It also reminds us that many of the animals around today had ancestors that would be completely unrecognizable to us.
 

This will prove to be foreshadowing, as the world in After Man is one that had been long ago inherited by the meek. As the title suggests, the humans are dead. So are all the other animals human-sized and larger. The world is very different now, after all the large animals went extinct fifty-millions years ago in the early 1980's.
 

This kind of thing comes with the territory of setting a book in the future. Just go with it.
But with that said, you have to remind yourself what most science fiction dealing with future evolution was like prior to
After Man. Typical scenarios include things like, "humans will keep getting smarter and smarter but they will also have terrible powers and be evil!" "There will be all kinds of giant monsters with big teeth and claws and blah!" And the good old chestnut, "radiation will cause normally innocuous animals to mutate and try to kill everyone!" Come to think of it, that last one is still around in full force; just replace "radiation" with "genetic engineering" (or, frankly, "writers who failed biology").
 

That's why After Man was so refreshing. It was also the first time many of us saw imagined animals treated with utmost respect and painted as if they were real. Here's one of the first illustrations in the book, introducing two major groups of future animals, the Rabbuck and Predator Rats, and it's still awesome:


 

Illustration by Diz Wallace, affectionately parodied here. This is how you illustrate creatures that don't exist. (Though it is a huge missed opportunity that the Rabbucks are not actually called jackalopes.) I wouldn't be surprised to see this exact scene in a real Victorian-era natural history book.


 

Illustration by Philip Hood. We've met two of the three major groups of animals in the previous illustration (the Rabbucks are large deer-like animals descended from rabbits and the Predator Rats are... exactly what it sounds like.) These Hornheads are in the third group, the Gigantelopes. Only the very small hoofed mammals like caprids survived into the future. I just like these guys because I have a soft spot for moose, sheep, and hadrosaurs.


 

Illustration by Philip Hood. Here's the lovely Desert Leaper, essentially a gigantic jerboa who has filled the niche left wide open by the camels. For those of you playing the Dougal Dixon drinking game, note that this guy is one of maybe three animals in the book that displays (ahem)...


 

Now let's meet the fellow alluded to in the beginning, Nightmare Fuel on Legs the Night Stalker, a predatory flightless bat.


 

Illustration by Diz Wallace. This illustration found it's way into several other sci-fi books and (subconsciously at least) into a number of character designs.
 

Gosh, this is already getting to be longer than I expected. Let's stop here and meet more of the animals in Part Two.
 

And here's the old Tetrapod Zoology post that got me thinking about Dixon's books again.
 

And, hey, it's Banned Books Week! I'm sure After Man has been challenged at one point or other. Or it would be if it were less obscure - which is one of the things about the Challenged Book List that gets me. (It seems a book isn't controversial until it gets popular or attention in the mainstream media. Note that it took a while for His Dark Materials to crack the top ten.)
 

And for the love of Benji, people. They're PENGUINS. (But I'm suddenly curious to know how, exactly, these penguins are also "anti-ethnic". WTF?!)

Monday, September 28, 2009

_The Time-Traveler's Wife_ , "Howl's Moving Castle", and other old reviews rescued from MySpace

(Originally posted on 3/22/06.)
When I started my old MySpace blog, I was on the hunt for a decent book. I had quite a few disappointments, even giving up on books that had been highly recommended to me. So I halfheartedly pick out a book I'd seen at the Library for some time now that looked kind of interesting, Audrey Niffenegger's The Time-Traveler's Wife. Go figure, it ended up being the first book in a long time that, about three chapters in, I had to do the Neverending Story thing with. (Neverending Story thing = Locking oneself in an attic and finishing a thoroughly amazing and engrossing book in one go. You know what that's like don't you?
Don't you?
I am a nerd.)
This is a book that made me laugh, it made me sob, it made me blush, and it made me shudder and - this is the kicker right here - the f___er made me think. And best of all, it made me think in the same way that my favorite truly thought-provoking fantastic fiction made me think. It takes a worn out fantasy concept and treats it with all-out seriousness, daring to ask what living with this fantastic element would really be like. (What I mean by this is, for example, that we learn the sometimes kinky, more often heartbreaking, and darn near always hellishly confusing and upsetting ramifications of quantum sex.) Imagine a good mash-up of "Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind", "The Sixth Sense", and "Memento". It's an emotional and mental workout, but it is well worth it.
And if I haven't sold you yet, there is the fact that your secret loathing of Bob Seger's "Old Time Rock-n-Roll" is finally vindicated in this book. Yes.

I must now heap praise upon Hayao Miyazaki's "Howl's Moving Castle", which is on DVD this week. Now, If you're ever going to trust me on any movie recommendations, trust me on this. The Studio Ghibli films are Anime for people who don't think they like Anime. Everything Disney nailed in their heyday can be found here. I highly recommend you check them out.
"Howl" is Miyazaki's latest triumph. Dude must be sick of hearing that. Doesn't he get bored of making superior movies? The characters are absolutely delightful and I love how there are more interesting things going on in any given background painting than some animators put into an entire feature. (It's almost poignant seeing the "Chicken Little" teaser trailer on this DVD.) That said, it might not be the best place to start for newbies; I say start with "Kiki's Delivery Service". It's my favorite (if I have to pick) and the most easily accessible of his films. From there, watch "My Neighbor Totoro" (one of the best children's films ever and just released on DVD), then try "Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind" and "Princess Mononoke" (two of the great action-fantasy Animes of all time), and then "Laputa: The Castle in the Sky", "Howl's Moving Castle", and "Spirited Away" (surreal fairy-tale fantasies). And keep an eye out for "Little Nemo" - an underrated Studio Ghibli production but one of my favs.
Incidentally, I have to mention something about "Howl" that I find very, very strange: some critics have said that the plot is too convoluted. Honestly, I didn't find it any more hard to follow than other Anime. Whatever, dudes. Next you'll be complaining that chocolate tastes too good or something.

I got two strange animated films from the fifties at an evil supermarket for a dollar. They were "Panda and the Magic Serpent" and "Adventures of Mr. WonderBird". And they were actually pretty good.

And finally, I watched "Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire" on DVD. Dad and I both agreed that it was pretty good. We also both agreed that, although we know the work that the person in charge of condensing the "Brick" Harry Potters into films has cut out for him, it was very strange some of the things left out. The SPEW subplot is an obvious example. But where was the payoff to the Rita Skeeter subplot? And for cryin' out loud, how come we didn't get to watch the Quidditch World Cup or how the other Triwizard Champions battled their dragons? Honestly, as I was reading the book all those years ago, I was secretly thinking to myself, "You just know J.K. put this in because it'll look kickass in the movie." The more I think of it, the more disappointed I am...
I might have fully transformed into a Harry Potter nerd right there. Hang on...
Iorek Lives!!!
That's better.
----

I've rescued a few old posts from MySpace and they'll be popping up over the next month.
And, there's a new review at The New Realm. Starting next month, there will be new reviews (or shamelessly recycled features with some new material) every week!
AND, I've uploaded a bunch of new art (and older art that I'd unintentionally hidden from myself earlier this crazy summer) at Flickr. Here is a sample, and you may consider it blatant foreshadowing of a future article:

4. Revenge of the Nibblers

In sillier news, did you get Oak's Letter yet?

Thursday, September 24, 2009

You must all read Lev Grossman's _The Magicians_. Because of Awesome.

Yes, I've read a book that was (all too briefly) on the New York Times bestseller list. Try not to freak out.
And it is very good. Scratch that, it's awesome. Grossman has basically freely admitted that he initially wrote the novel to contain all the awesome stuff he loves in fantastic fiction.
This is that rare work of fiction that, very like "Who Framed Roger Rabbit", rewards you for being a fan of the genre. And it also serves as a by turns bleakly funny satire and heartaching deconstruction of the fantasy genre.
The novel takes on two very big targets directly. The whole subgenre of wizard school novels a la
Harry Potter and Earthsea is the subject of the first large section of the book. What happens when a magic student graduates anyway? And I'm not talking about a Ged or a Harry Potter or an Ender, just a no-name nerd in Ravenclaw house. What are they supposed to do after school?
A lengthy deconstruction of
The Chronicles of Narnia forms the bulk of the second half of the novel, and as someone who was always subtly irked by the central conceit of a magical land populated by powerful mythical beings who for some reason require the aid of some random Earth schoolkids to save them, this made me very happy. The characters even call the Aslan-equivalent character out on waiting around for them instead of helping his people.
Really, though, read the book. It might be the greatest genre-busting novel I have read since The Time-Traveler's Wife (and, gosh, I need to rescue that review from the depths of my abandoned MySpace blog.) Do not resist the Awesome. I'd love to hear reactions from non-fantasy fans and readers new to the genre.
Oh, and here's the sketch of "The Final Charge" alluded to in the last post:
9.2.09 - "The Final Charge"
As always, click for massive. I'm not going to lie. This might be the baddest-a**ed thing I drew all summer.

Tuesday, September 22, 2009

Open Thread: Help me come up with a good answer for the dread question, "Are you drawing?!"

You know the feeling. You are at the Mall, doing gesture studies of the shoppers. Or you are at the zoo, drawing a sensitive portrait of a ruffed lemur. Or, perhaps, you are at the L.L. Cool Beanz flagship store, of all places, where you have found the following astonishing incongruity:

And you, being you (by which I mean being me... this is going to get really confusing really fast), immediately sit down and start sketching. It doesn't take you long to get into The Zone. You're in your element. This is what it's all about: you, your trusty pencil, your beloved Sketchbook, and a subject that is totally awesome. Nothing can distract you as you build up your drawing...
And then, inevitably, somebody will notice you. And they may even come over to look over your shoulder and watch you draw. And aside from being really awkward, you're so into what you're drawing that it probably won't bother you -- except that it's usually an adult who wants to watch you draw (things would be different if it was just a kid, especially one of the "I do not yet understand the concept of 'personal space'" age range.)
And then comes The Question. You know the one.
"Are you DRAWING???"
What I ask of you this week, dear readers, is to give me a good answer to this question. At least one better than,
"Uh... (looks flabbergasted) well, yeah. Duh."

In happier news, "Fraggle Rock Season 4/5" is available for pre-order at Amazon!

Thursday, September 17, 2009

In Which Trish gives up and watches "Happy Feet"!

Yes, even though, ages ago, I said I didn't feel like I'd ever need to. Because this movie about a penguin who tap-dances to bad covers of popular songs can't possibly be a fraction as entertaining as reading the message boards and discussion threads where people, people who are probably reasonable adults in real life, have ridiculously intense arguments about (just as a reminder) a movie about a tap-dancing penguin.

As you may recall, the animation-enjoying population of the internet was essentially ripped asunder when this thing won Best Animated Feature. If you do not recall, or you want to relive the magic and wonder of that experience, here's the relevant Cartoon Brew thread. (Bring marshmallows. Lots of them.)

It was partially that and partially rereading this Onion AV Club review of "Babe: Pig in the City" that inspired me to add it to the ol' Netflix Queue. I rented "Pig in the City" as well and was able to watch both films back to back. (It is three-thirty in the morning as I write this fresh off the experience.) My reaction to "City" was nearly identical to that of Scott Tobias and his readers. It is a brilliant, criminally underrated, beautiful film that is also batsh*t insane in all the right ways; "the stuff of impeccably choreographed nightmares". The animals are better actors than most humans and, best of all, the voice-over acting is refreshingly understated with help from a witty, oddly moving script. Naturally, I was pumped for "Happy Feet".

As I mentioned, it is very early in the morning as I write this. I could probably just say that I can see why people were, shall we say, opinionated about this movie.

Let's get it out of the way: the Mo-Cap is
ugly. There's something off-putting about human eyes and giant, humanlike mouths and tongues in an otherwise fairly realistic nonhuman creature. There's something off-putting about seeing a creature that is anatomically wildly different than a human move and act like a human. I never thought I'd ever feel like I was hit with the Uncanny Valley stick by a cartoon penguin.

The voices are downright surreal. Why hire Hugh Jackman and Nicole Kidman for your animated film if they're just going to do lame impressions of Elvis and Marilyn Monroe? What the hell is the point? Why not hire actual voice actors who'd do better imitations? And why oh
why do we have to be hearing Robin Williams come out of the noise-hole of every other character? (OK, maybe it just sounds that way after a while. Still.)

The songs are beyond surreal. Sometimes you can tell, during a musical whose soundtrack is made up of pre-existing songs, that the people who compiled the songs were only seeking catchy beats and tunes or focused on one or two lyrics relevant to the story. This is such a musical. Boy, is it ever such a musical. There's a scene where an adorable/creepily humanlike baby penguin sings "The Message" by Grandmaster Flash, and I do not believe that it is possible for any living thing with breath in their body to watch this scene without going: 😨

As far as the story... Okay, WTF was the lesson here? Pick a moral, kids!
* - Animals are only interesting when they act like people.
* - If there is something new and different, everyone must eventually conform to this new thing or else.
* - If you are different and/or special, your life is going to suck. Hard. Even if you eventually save the day, you must expect to be banished at some point. Probably by your own family.
* - The last wild places in the world, those uninhabited by mankind, are worth saving. If they're amusing to humans. If not, f*** 'em.

The film also boasts a memorably awkward happy ending, the last moral on my list (I guess I was supposed to get "save the penguins" out of it but it sure doesn't come across that way) is delivered with all the subtlety of an entire season of "Captain Planet", and did I mention that Robin Williams voices more than one major character? I don't even know how to react to this movie. It is astonishing. Not the good kind of astonishing, but the "What the hell did I just watch?" kind of astonishing.

Overall, Best Animated Feature of 2006? Really?
Really? REALLY?!? So the lesson I'm taking is that the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences obviously hates Richard Linkletter's animated films with the white hot fury of a thousand stars.

Oh, the well-loved Tex Avery short, "I Love to Singa" is on the DVD, and I find this ironic, funny, and sad because it owns the hell out of "Happy Feet".

Addendum: Albertonychus' review!

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

Further Thoughts on "The Nac Mac Feegles of the Bird World"

Yes, because it is nearly Feederwatch Season again. No time like the present to start talking about flight-capable theropod overlords friends.
8.15.09 - Hummingbird Feeder Standoff
You can't discuss animals who are way more badass than you'd expect without a mention of Hummingbirds. (The title of this post is inspired by a recent discussion on this very topic at Fark.com. If you get the reference, you are awesome.)
Now, to normal people like your mom and my mom, the Ruby-Throated Hummingbird is a beautiful jewel in flight. A sparkling Fairylike apparition of the garden. A bird that thinks it's a bug. How cunnin'.
To you and I, however, this shiny little Beebalm-enjoying pixie is better summed up thusly: a dart that can aim itself.
Really, this should be obvious. We're talking about a hand-held dinosaur who lives on a diet of straight-up sugar-water. They are a tad bit high-strung. Hummingbirds ain't nothin' to eff with. I remember being seven years old-ish and opening the latest issue of Ranger Rick only to be confronted by "Teenie Meanies", a kid-friendly article about the territorial ferocity of our friend, Archilochus colubris. In first-person, our Trochillid narrator basically asked, in so many questions, "Let's shrink a human to three grams and see how well they do!" (Ah, Ranger Rick. I shall have to tribute you someday if I can dig up an old issue or two.)
The above watercolor sketch depicts a scene that lasted about a half second. I had a rather unusual number of hummingbirds visiting my feeders this summer; three regulars and maybe five altogether. There were many fights. The toughest one was a big (for a hummingbird) female. Later on, she met her match when a smaller but bolder male arrived.
I was, all told, anxious while refilling the feeders.
Depending on where you live, there may still be hummingbirds flying through the area, so keep those feeders full. I did a experiment this summer, and it turns out that homebrew sugar water (bring three and a half cups of water to a boil, dissolve one cup of pure cane sugar in it, cool, refrigerate) is a hell of a lot more popular than the garish red commercial mixes.
----
Unrelated, but I laughed harder than I should have at this:


Meanwhile, California is getting the really awesome convention. Is there anything like this on the East Coast and, oh, NOT on the weekend before a major travel holiday?
A-a-a-a-n-d since everyone else is talking about it, have you visited "Covered" yet?

Thursday, September 10, 2009

"Why are the cute ones always insane?"

Forgive me if my "Simpsons"-quoting-Fu is a little off.  

Ah, TetZoo (the lovely Tetrapod Zoology Blog), how I love you. I have not sung your praises enough, but you teach me new things about animals I thought I knew everything there was to know about (or at least enough). And just recently, you taught me that Ti... er, Paridae have been known to wreck the guano out of Pipistrelle bats. Seriously. (NOTE: There are some graphic photos in that link that aren't appropriate for small children or big babies. That poor bat.)

Dude.
Dude!
Really, I wish I could come up with a more eloquent word or phrase with which to verbalize my reaction to this, but...
dude...
On a lighter note, and on the subject of blogs in my reading list thingie, I found this little stop-motion slice of awesome whilst doing an archive binge of Cake Wrecks:



I love how each different kind of frosting has their own personality and style of movement. It just goes to show that there are some concepts that a certain animation technique is just perfect for.
(Speaking of Cake Wrecks, my favorites are screaming Hannah Montana,
this hilariously inappropriate "video games theme cake", clearly based upon the first interesting thing that turned up during a Google image search for "Video Game", and this truly horrifying edible reenactment of birth trauma.)
I am retaining the "two posts a week" for the next few weeks, as I am going to be working on a Super Special Awesome project starting next week. I don't know how much I can talk about it here, but I have to have it done by the end of the month.
I hate to be cryptic, but when the time is right, you'll learn more.

Tuesday, September 8, 2009

"Whale Magic" is going to break your mind.

I... I... I have no words for this (discovered by Cartoon Brew):

ZOMG Whale Magic!!!

I'm usually pretty good at sensing whether something is an elaborate satire or not and this is just too amazingly insane not to be real. Honestly, though, I'd rather see them elaborate on the story of Richter Duck.

Thursday, September 3, 2009

Something I posted after watching "The Land Before Time" for the first time in a while...

Originally posted at LaGremlin Land on 1/19/07.

You watch one movie enough times and it becomes a part of you. The millionth time was the charm for me and "Land Before Time" and here are some thoughts I had watching it recently:

* - Where are the "L.B.T." fan-websites?
I went out looking for some and came up empty-handed, so I guess I'm filling the niche with this page. I did find some information but it really raised more questions than answers. This has a lot to do with my second thought.

* - Where's the Production Information?
You know, sometimes you wish you *didn't* know so much about a movie's production. "L.B.T." in particular has had a lot of trivia popping up in recent years (particularly on IMDB and animation history books).
Most tantalizing is the rumor of deleted scenes, ten full minutes of them. Watch the movie very carefully and you'll see three scenes where this footage was most likely cut from:
(1) Note that there's no break between Sharptooth's first attack and the Earthquake sequence. Very awkward. I've seen a lot of evidence to suggest that most of the footage was cut out here.
(2) Between the scene where Littlefoot and Duckie meet Petrie and the scene where Cera encounters Sharptooth underground, there appears to be another awkward cut.
(3) I'm convinced that there was some major editing done in the finale. Note that Littlefoot makes it to the cliff overlooking the Great Valley *alone* and that none of the other characters are seen or heard at all. Then we see all the missing characters racing through the rock tunnel towards the Valley and then everyone *including Littlefoot with Petrie riding on his head* stops short on the cliff overlooking the Valley. Very strange.
(4) Miscellaneous weird edits: Listen carefully to the narrator in the scene where Cera gets put in her place at the end of the volcano sequence. Pronoun trouble! Also, there's obvious awkward overdubbing when Cera charges in to save the day at the end of the Sharptooth must die sequence ("Cera! You're back!").
What really frustrates me, and I know I'm not alone here, is that there's almost no chance we'll ever know the whole story here. There are only tantalizing little clues like the commercials (see the Links, below.) And that ties into my third thought.

* - Why do DVDs of Don Bluth movies suck?
My VHS has pretty much had it after eighteen years. However, I'm reluctant to buy the DVD because a little research reveals that they evidently used the same print from the VHS release without cleaning up the print at all or preserving the original aspect ratio. Worse, the few special features lend no insight into the original "Land Before Time" at all, and instead focus on the sequels. Speaking of…

* - THERE ARE NO SEQUELS!!!
There aren't! I can't hear you!
Seriously, with craptacular sequels ruining the reputation of the original, I maintain that "Land Before Time" is the animated world's "Halloween".

November 2008 is the twentieth anniversary of "Land Before Time". Who knows, maybe Universal will get a clue by then.
Though I doubt it…

Many, Many Related Links and Sources:
The Wikipedia Entry, IMDB.com Entry, and Rotten Tomatoes Entry are as good enough places as any to start. I suppose the Official Universal Studios Website is worth a look too (though, again, they are far more interested in promoting the sequels).
Here are two most curious finds. The video trailer and Pizza Hut commercial both feature a few quick scenes of animation that aren't in the film (for example, Duckie makes a face and Littlefoot says, "We'll always be together!") Were they made exclusively for the commercials? That seems like a terribly expensive thing to do for just a commercial. So, are they the last vestiges of the deleted scenes?
The book, The Animated Films of Don Bluth is long out of print. But this online version contains all of the original text (sadly, no illustrations). It has quite a lot of information about the production of "Land Before Time".
Lastly, here are links to the websites of artists who either worked on "The Land Before Time" or clearly had an influence on the look of the film:
Michel Gagne was a lead animator on "The Land Before Time" (not to mention several other great -and not so great- animated films). I recognized his style immediately when I saw his work in the wonderful Flight anthologies. His website is awesome with tons of sketches, and you'll even get to watch his jaw-dropping short film, "Prelude to Eden".
When I found a book of William Stout paintings, I knew he had to have been an "L.B.T." production artist too - but his name is nowhere to be seen in the credits. Still, many of the animals in "Land Before Time" look a LOT like his designs, and there even appear to be "shots" in the movie inspired by specific Stout paintings.
Finally, here's Don Bluth's Website! And… it's very strange. He has almost no information whatsoever about his movies! What gives? On the other hand, you get to watch two of the best scenes from "L.B.T." And you can even communicate with Mr. Bluth through a message board!
And although it's an entirely different movie, anyone reading this article will probably be most interested to know that the long-rumored Special Edition DVD of "The Secret of N.I.M.H." has been released. (With no promotion and a cover design that shows open hatred of the fandom; but it's still excellent.) This gives me some hope that maybe we'll see similar treatments for other Bluth films.
And finally, there's the Don Bluth TV Trope page and this item that popped up, by a happy coincidence, on Once Upon A Win.

-------

Hey, did you hear about that one giant company that bought that other giant company? (Some naughty words in that link.)

Tuesday, September 1, 2009

Further "Avatar" thoughts...

I and other keenly observant watchers of the "Avatar" trailer have noticed something about the design of the film's alien characters, the Na'vi. These characters, who are "Unlike anything you have ever seen before, even in your wildest imagination," seem strangely familiar.
Let's be blunt: They look like something off of DeviantART.
They have animal features but are still very human-like, they have ginormous golden Anime eyeballs, and -most damning- they are that particular shade of blue everyone at DA seems to love, and -even more damning- they glow.
Really the only things missing are the glowing "Mystical Symbols" floating around their beautiful, beautiful Blue Jay patterned Angel wings.
I decided I wanted to play this game too! Here's what I came up with:


"Fun in the Backyard!" - Episode 38
Originally uploaded by Babbletrish
Click for big!

Yeah...
By the way, no offense is meant to the approximately 10% of awesome Furry artists on DA. I am obviously in no position to make fun of you and I won't for a minute pretend that Sturgeon's Law doesn't apply to Flickr too. It's just that your Online Portfolio Website of choice is a *little* bit more notorious for it.