Showing posts with label executive meddling. Show all posts
Showing posts with label executive meddling. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 31, 2013

Random 90's Animation: "Quest for Camelot" (1998)

Before delving into any of the projects I listed in the last post, let's cross another Random and/or Obscure Theatrical Animated Feature From the 1990's off the big old list.  Today's selection takes us into the late 1990's, and at this point animated features made in the very stereotypically Disney mold were coming in from even the most unexpected studios.

Arguably the strangest source for such a film was Warner Bros. animation. At the time, they were riding high on the success (commercially, certainly, goodness knows, not critically) of "Space Jam".  One of the people who worked on "Space Jam" -I forget who, unfortunately- described Warner Bros. feature animation as the antithesis of Walt Disney Feature Animation.  "They're the Merchant Ivory of animation," he said, "and we're more like 'Die Hard'!"  Which was a fine philosophy to have -- except then they went and made one of the most unabashed rip-offs of the Disney feature formula ever created.  Well then.

Watching "Quest for Camelot" with this in mind gives the movie an aura of strangeness that it certainly did not need, because the whole damn movie is just weird as hell.  It's weird in a really tedious and uninteresting way, though.  Rumor has it that the initial script for "Quest" was much more unique and interesting, but the poor thing got executive meddled to hell and back.  Additionally, nobody working on the film really enjoyed doing so.  I can believe both these rumors because you can really tell while watching "Quest" that the whole thing was a mess from the script level and nobody involved seemed to know what to do with it.

The basic story of the movie is staggeringly mediocre, to the point where it's even hard to discuss it.  I will address one of the big elephants in the room though: Not even a minute and a half into "Quest for Camelot" it occurred to me that this has to be what the people I know who still refuse to watch "Brave" must imagine "Brave" to be like.  It's as if "Quest" came first and took the bullet for "Brave", making all the boring and wimpy decisions so "Brave" didn't have to.

It is hopefully enough to say that "Quest for Camelot", having given us a plucky girl-hero who wishes to be a brave warrior instead of a pretty princess, decides about halfway through to give her a broody, angsty male sidekick/love interest.  *sigh...*

To the film's credit, they do at least attempt to do something interesting with AngstyWangsty McOurGirlHeroNeedsABoyfriend.  This is a major animated feature film with a blind protagonist.  That's actually really cool.  So it's too bad that (a) this movie sucks and (b) every song this character sings calls attention to his disability.  I couldn't make that up if I wanted to and it is just as horrible as it sounds.

So it's time to address the other elephant in the room: the songs.  Oh, boy, the songs.  I have a story to go along with one of the songs in this movie.  Did you know that the beloved and powerful Andrea Bocelli ballad "The Prayer" comes from this movie?  Most people don't know that.  I already knew this because (incoming sad personal story) I had the unfortunate job of picking the music that would play in the background during my Grandmother's wake.  Yeah.  My Grandmother was a huge fan of Andrea Bocelli, and this song was beautiful and moving and bittersweet, and everyone cried when they heard it.

So thankfully, it didn't seem like anyone there knew the original context for the song in "Quest for Camelot".  Most people would probably expect this song to play during a scene in the movie that would be, you know, appropriate.  At all.  Fortunately, I already knew that the scene where "The Prayer" appears is... not that.  Unfortunately, the scene in question is very like the "This is the skin of a KILLER!!!" scene in the first "Twilight" movie.  NOTHING can fully prepare you for it.


Man, I don't know where to take the review from here.  Would anyone mind if I just transcribe and elaborate on my notes?  Seems like the easier thing to do here cause I'm kind of sick of talking about "Quest for Camelot" and there's still a lot of ground to cover:

* - There's an awful lot of Irish iconography and Some-Kind-Of-Irishy-Or-Something music (actual genre; my iTunes library says so) in this movie supposedly set in Arthurian Merry Old England.  To be fair, this movie is already very lenient with the story of King Arthur (even though Arthur himself is barely in it and he, the Knights of the Round Table, and especially Merlin do an excellent job of being completely useless), but it gets weird.

* - I like how you can pick out who is going to betray the Knights of the Round Table only seven minutes in.

* - Funny, the animation here doesn't really look like "Batman: Mask of the Phantasm", "Space Jam", "Iron Giant", or "Osmosis Jones".  It actually reminds me more of "The Swan Princess," not least because of the male lead's distracting giant mouth.

* - In any case, whatever animation team they did put in charge was just not comfortable with it.  Ye gods, some of the designs on these minor characters...

* - There is a flashback to LITERALLY TEN MINUTES AGO!?!

* -  There is Conspicuous CGI and then there's this.  One of the special features on the disk goes on and on about this new computer-assisted animation technology called "Regging", and I wonder if that tech ever went anywhere or if it explains why the film looks so strange?

* - Sure glad that one character told us in the audience that the monster attacking King Arthur right now is a gryphon because this movie's take on the beast is... different.  This is the only instance where I didn't entirely hate that this is one of those movies where the characters provide a running commentary on everything we see happening onscreen.

* - This is... this sure is a Villain Song.

* - Say, why is ObviousBadGuy McCantEvenLookAtThoseFingernails even attacking Not-Merida's house?  It'd make sense if she made the potion he's using to make his monster army or something, but she didn't.  The stated reason is that her mom knows how to get to Camelot.  Except there's an obvious main road with obvious signs that lead you there?  It can't be because her presence would make them less conspicuous because they don't even bother to hide in the wagons along the way.  Basically, he's attacking Not-Merida's house because of Plot Reasons.

* - Speaking of ObviousBadGuy's monsters.  Holy mother of vocal dissonance, they come up with a kind of badass monster design and then they give it a shrill, whiny Bronson Pinchot voice, WHY?!?

* - You know, it'd be really cool if the Forbidden Forest was actually based on enchanted forest mythology from the British Islands, but that'd take actual imagination.  And not the "you can tell the animators dipped into the brown acid" kind of imagination.  Which is an easy dig, but really, look at this.

* - Let's not even talk about the deeply unpleasant dragon sidekick and it's (their? I don't even give a s**t) ghastly song.  It's like two insufferably obnoxious sidekicks for the price of one!

* - On the subject of small annoying creatures, was the falcon ever on-model to start with?  Cause for most of the movie it looks like a pile of fluff hovering around making dubbed-in Red-Tailed Hawk sounds.  Additionally, I'd call the chicken-thingy a JarJar-esque nuisance, except noted worst character ever JarJar Binks, like it or not, actually did contribute anything at all to the plot.

* - There's a scene late in the movie where it is heavily implied that Not-Merida would have succeeded in avoiding ObviousBadGuy and his minions on the road to Camelot and saved the day if she'd waited for her (all-male) sidekicks to join her.  Instead, she goes on without them, gets captured and dragged off to the castle, and ends up being rescued by the menfolks.  Seriously.  This happens.  Ugh...

* - The entire ending is just layer upon layer of "what just happened?"  A lot of plot points get resolved in a pretty cramped amount of running time, then the movie just stops.  But not before Not-Merida and AngstyWangsty get married, because of course that happens.  And then it just literally stops, as if even the movie is sick of itself.

For more in this series, click this link or the "Random 90's Animation Month" tag below.

-----

Sketch of the Day!  Have a random, half-Azhdarchid, half-"Dark Crystal" Landstrider creature designs.

7.25.13 Sketchbook Page

I should probably mention that prior commitments are keeping me away from Boston Comicon this year, but I hope to enjoy the show vicariously through the internet!

Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Revisiting "My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic"

"I just read Total Media Bridge's "MLP:FIM" post and wanted to get your opinion on the matter as you probably know a lot more about it than I do.
"Specifically, while TMB made many a good point (E.g. I too thought the S3 finale was oddly structured), he seemed overly critical & negative (E.g. The things he said about Luna & Discord were misleading or wrong).  On the one hand, I'm OK w/MLP:FIM getting girlier because, as far as I can tell, the only especially girly aspects of the show are the songs & friendship lessons.  If a girlier show just means more of/greater emphasis on said aspects, then there shouldn't be a problem so long as it's still a good show with clever humor, interesting stories and fun characters (even if it's not as great overall as it was in the first two seasons).  On the other hand, I'm just speculating because I really have no idea where the show's going in future seasons.
"Many thanks in advance for your help."

-JD-man
Comment on Links of Interest: Snowed In Edition (some editing for clarity)

Welp.



You may have noticed that it has been a while, a long, long while, since I have said anything about  "My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic".  It's been a while since I mentioned "My Little Pony" in general as a matter of fact.  First, for some context, let's catch up with "Friendship is Magic".   In the excellent first season:

* - We got six well-defined female characters with both strengths and flaws who vehemently refuse to to conform to what you'd expect to be their stereotypes (the nerdy girl is the take-charge leader, the shy girl wrestles bears for fun) and who, in their own quiet way, teach the young audience that there are many types of girls and it's okay to be any one of them -or three of them for that matter.  

By the way, SIX female characters with personalities more interesting than "isn't a boy"!  If you want to make yourself depressed, list the cartoons that even have more than just one female character.

* - We got a few stories about bullies ("Griffon the Brush-Off", "Boast Busters", "Call of the Cutie") that -halleluiah!- kept subverting the old trope of how mean people are just misunderstood and we can all be friends if we just try hard enough.  Look, nasty, antagonistic people who evidently get pleasure out of ruining your whole day exist, and they don't just go away or stop picking on you if you stop paying attention to them and trying to get them to stop usually just makes things worse.  The best you can hope for is to find friends and find a way to cope with mean people together.

* - We got a terrific episode ("Suited for Success") about a character whose career is in the creative field, and she needs to help her friends prepare for a special event.  It dealt head-on with the fact that, if you're going to make your living through the arts when you grow up, you can't it to be just having fun all the time.  Sometimes you are going to have to make compromises and deal with people who might have a hard time trusting your instincts and knowledge or maybe don't even know what they want until they see it.  That, and there's a nice little nod to the fact that sometimes success depends on who you know. (Not to mention a possible disguised venting of frustration with executive meddling perhaps?)

* - We got the aforementioned "Call of the Cutie", which was essentially, "Are You There, Celestia?  It's Me, Apple Bloom..."  And this is an episode where a character who is the Pony equivalent of a pre-adolescent ends up not getting her much longed-for indicator of growing up in the end.  And the thing is, it isn't because she learned that you only get rewarded if you don't want whatever it is you wish for too much (which is the usual direction such stories take and I've always felt that it takes Gold-medal qualifying mental gymnastics for it to make any sense.)  Instead, she gained friends who have the same goal and the same issues.  And ever since that episode, they've been working together to reach that same goal, supporting each-other along the way.  The fact that we can get such a frank, mature discussion of an issue most girl cartoons won't even touch even though every girl is going to have to deal with it is staggeringly cool.

* - And above all else, we got -and this cannot be emphasized enough- a terrific, well-thought-out, animated series directed primarily at little girls that was made out of love and concern and accepted responsibility, instead of the more usual cynicism and sexism. 

Yep, it's time to have the Gender Issues in Children's Media talk again after not having tackled it in years either, come to mention it.  Hey, in for a penny, in for a pound.  I will try not to turn this into a huge derail because there's still a ton to unpack here (I haven't even got to Season two, let alone three), and already essays have been written about these issues, long ones, by people more knowledgeable than me.

But it does need to be discussed here because, you see, to have a good or even passable show directed at little girls is surprisingly and distressingly rare.  Remember "Barbie and the Fairy Secret"?  Because one thing I did not mention during that crazy tangent is the very worst thing about those terrible DTV Barbie movies: the vast majority of media for girls does not get any better than that.  It doesn't.

Girl cartoons (children's media in general, really, but girl cartoons especially) are caught in this vicious loop where the producers make lazy stereotype-driven crappy shows for girls, notice that girls are watching those lazy crappy stereotype-driven shows, assume that they must love that lazy crap without noticing that the only reason the girls are watching their crap is because there is nothing else out there for them, and then simply create more lazy stereotype-driven crap, because why bother if the little brats are going to watch it anyway?  So damn near all media directed at girls is openly cynical and insulting, since it's just meant to sell toys, dresses, makeup, and other awful "girlie" things based off clueless decades-old stereotyping (and notice how easily "girlie" becomes a pejorative!  People assume all media for girls is crap by default only because so much of it is shameless and cynical!  In the above-quoted comment, even the positive things associated mostly with media aimed at girls like musical numbers and social messages are "girlie"!)  Just because these stereotypes are coming from laziness or obliviousness or pure corporate greed, it doesn't make them any less sexist.

(Quick tangent: Come to mention it, perhaps the most messed-up thing about the Barbie movies -or the eye-bleedingly terrible "My Little Pony" cartoon that immediately preceded "Friendship is Magic" for that matter- is that, as awful as they are, they're still doing a better job than most of what's out there because they have more than one female lead character at all. Once again, if you want to make yourself depressed, list works of animation that even have more than one female protagonist.  I'll be over here waiting, and nursing a strong drink.

Though while I am on this note, I should have mentioned last week that I was most surprised and delighted to see two well-characterized female leads in "Wreck-It Ralph".  Surprised, because the ads downplayed the role of one and then made the other out to be nothing more than an annoying little nuisance.  To be fair, Vanillope does start out like that, but she quickly becomes more sympathetic and ends up as the most awesome character in the film.)  

Look, the seven-year-old girl who sits down to watch a show/movie/etc. directed at her demographic tragically lives in a world where she will never be allowed to forget that she is a girl.  Throughout her life, she is going to be flooded with loaded messages about her gender and what it means and -intentionally or not- what society expects her to be.  Male characters tend not to have to face these things, and it is -if I haven't mentioned it enough- damn depressing how the male gender is so often "normal" where female is "different".  (You only have to have been paying attention to "Jurassic Park" to know how insane this is.)  And all this is to say, thank goodness for Lauren Faust, because she actually cares about these kinds of issues. (Yeesh, this DID turn into a huge derail.  Sorry about that.)

With "Friendship is Magic", we got a series that was put in the capable hands of a woman who had grown up with the franchise and resolved right away to keep all the good things about it and toss the stupid stereotypical crap.  (Her original pitch was more "Return of Tambelon", less "Ice Cream Wars".  Obviously, compromises happened, but the show avoided overt cutesy crap for a good long time.)  On top of that, in each of her series, Lauren Faust cares a lot about animation (yo, somebody greenlight Galaxy Girls already!)  The result is something that is genuinely fun to watch, with great songs, interesting side-characters, and a well-developed setting.  It's funny without being self-referential or sarcastic, and sweet without being self-conscious.

The second season kept up the good work for the most part.  However, there were a few moments where it was obvious Lauren Faust had been relegated to a less prominent role, and it looks like she had a harder time nurturing the series.  For example:

* - "Luna Eclipsed".  Oh ye Gods, "Luna Eclipsed".  I'll admit this one sticks in my craw even more than "Feelin' Pinkie Keen".  Okay, so put yourself in Princess Luna's place there: You were overtaken by an evil entity that fed on your envy and wound up banished by your own sister to live alone on the moon for a thousand years.  You managed to free yourself, and were brought back to your normal, good self through magical intervention.  And then you come down to check on everyone, hopefully reconnect with your subjects, and you learn that in those intervening thousand years, an entire holiday has developed based upon the fact that you went crazy and tried to take over the world that one time and how everyone still fears and hates you.  Find anyone who would be as chill about all of this as Luna was.  But then there's an even bigger WTF moment where she plays along with it and invokes her old evil self because, according to Twilight, "we like you but we want to have fun being scared"!?!  No.

* - The "Mare Do Well" episode doesn't bug me quite as much but it's a very good example of how the characters started acting really odd during this season.  Rainbow Dash starts doing the small name, big ego thing so this other pony shows up to humble her.  Which would be strange in itself but then it turns out it was all of Dash's friends messing with her?  And once again, she's totally chill about this?  O... kay?

* - Generally speaking, you'd think more would have been done with the Cutie Mark Crusaders in the second season; perhaps a bit more character development or -my gosh- even an episode where one of the Crusaders gets her mark and they have to deal with the repercussions from then on.  I know Status Quo is God, but couldn't an exception be made when -uh- the whole reason these characters got together is because they're hoping to be transformed forever?  Hell, "Pokemon" let Caterpie turn into Metapod and then Butterfree over the course of the first half of the first season!  Meanwhile, the CMCs are basically the same as they were before and, worse, have more or less been relegated to background noise.

* - Derpy-gate.  That is all.  (Don't ask me to explain if you don't know because everything about it gives me the acid reflux.) 

* - And finally, I guess we all knew this was coming, but the season started to get increasingly toyetic as it went along.  Then again, they did manage to make the two-part finale meant to tie-in with the wedding playset one of the most awesome episodes of the season.

That brings us, finally, to season three, and here is where we come to the awkward, possibly controversial part of this post. Why haven't I been talking about My Little Ponies more often since the series really got underway?  Well, I said that the reason is because the My Little Pony fandom has changed.  A lot.  Man, how can I explain this without actually invoking it?

It's like, let's imagine there's this bird feeder, right?  And this feeder has been up for a couple of decades and, while the person filling the feeder has screwed up a couple of times, the birds still love it and many of the mother birds have brought their little fledgelings to the feeder.  And everything is just great.

There's a brand new version of the old bird feeder up that is very close to the same style as the oldest feeder, and the person who fills the feeder decides to add a few nuts into the seed mix.

So now, there are squirrels visiting the bird feeder.  To be fair, a lot of the squirrels are pretty cool; they remember the feeder is for birds and they don't mind sharing since they know the person who set up the feeder did so for the little fledgeling birds.

But then there are a few squirrels who are all like, "This feeder has NUTS in it!  It's for US!!!  How could it not REALLY be for US if it has NUTS in it?!?"  And there honestly aren't a lot of these squirrels.  But they are, unfortunately, the most vocal and obnoxious visitors to the feeder, and it almost feels like they will not be truly happy until they have driven away everyone who isn't a squirrel due to their awful behavior.

Well, for the third year that this new feeder is up, the person who fills it has gotten a bit uncomfortable with the crazier squirrels and swaps out the nuts for safflower seeds.

The squirrels are vocally upset.  "WHY!  WHY did they replace all the cool nuts we love with stupid seeds that only baby BIRDS love?!?"  Distressingly, some of the mother birds who point out, "Guys, it is a BIRD FEEDER" are viciously attacked.  Some even start to become too uncomfortable to even discuss this feeding station that they've been visiting since they themselves were fledgelings.

Finally, for the last week that the feeder will be up for the season (I am following this metaphor right into the center of the sun), the person in charge of filling it has decided that they should focus only on the target audience of fledgeling birds and dumps a whole load of Cayenne Pepper into the seed mix.

The youngest birds are ecstatic, the older birds are a little put off, and the squirrels have completely lost their sh*t.

Now It has yet to be seen if, in the aftermath, the squirrels will bother visiting the feeder and just complain or circle-jerk over how much better the feeder was two years ago.  Or if they will just, you know, let the fledgeling birds have their own reasonably good cartoon for six-year-old girls feeder for fledgeling birds and leave them alone.

So... did everybody get that?  If not, too bad, because this is as close as I am willing to go to that particular issue.

Okay, back to the main question.  You want my honest opinion regarding the third season of "Friendship is Magic"?  Well, I will say that this is my response to many of the fans' reactions to the third season:  Look at all these men being upset over a reasonably good cartoon for seven-year-old girls stumbling into the same stupid stereotypical toyetic trap that WAAAAY too many shows directed at seven-year-old girls have done since I myself was a seven-year-old girl.

Alright, I know that's going to be incendiary as hell even though I think I am allowed to have strong opinions about a franchise I've been on board with since it's inception, so let me explain (and remember, I moderate comments and unreasonable people get deleted).  There's a lot of nostalgia for the franchises of the 1980's, yet the thing so many people forget about that era is the fact that a lot of cartoons were really gender-segregated.

For the most part, even the worst cartoons directed at boys had excitement, explosions, monsters, and action, so they were at least interesting to look at.  (They also had their own collection of awful, unfair super-manly stereotypes, but that's it's own massive rabbit hole and I'd feel more comfortable letting a male writer tackle them.  Also, holy S**T this is getting to be a lot of words about Ponies!)  Meanwhile, the girl crap was a pink, gooey limbo of school drama (there's more Gold-medal qualifying mental gymnastics at work here. To paraphrase "Animaniacs", "Golly, there's nothing a kid would love to do after school than to watch a bunch of shows ABOUT going to school!"), shopping, slumber parties, tea parties, school dances, friendship-ending misunderstandings that would be wrapped up in half a second if anyone was allowed to have common sense, gag.

I've had to cope with that kind of stereotypical "this is what you are SUPPOSED to like" girlie-girl B.S. since I was very little.  And remember, this is coming from the adult woman who used to be the little girl who was more interested in dinosaurs and computers and nature than dolls and makeup and frilly dresses. It was rough, let me tell you.  So forgive me if I'm a little tiny bit resentful of guys having to deal with it for probably the first time ever. This is on top of my more general resentment over the fact that these creepy weirdos could have fixated on anything else in the world, but for whatever reason they chose a really awesome revival of a franchise I have a lot of nostalgia for and just want to be able to share with my little cousins without their shitty behavior haunting my mind or without worrying about my cousins ever running into it themselves.  (Yes, there was a weird underbelly to the My Little Pony fandom back in the early days of the Internet, but you really had to dig for the most brain-breaking stuff.  Most of the weirdness involving Ponies was a more fun/harmless kind of weird.  As I recall, Quacker County and Beyond Dream Castle were pretty insane, but reading them wouldn't do you any permanent damage.)

So now that that's established, what did I think of this latest season of "Friendship is Magic"?  Well, this is a little complicated.  In a strange way, it makes me think of the current kerfuffle over post-Dan Harmon "Community".  Both series had a showrunner with a very distinct voice and now that they are either in a less-involved position or gone outright, the show is... different.  It's not bad, mind you; it's still far superior to anything else currently airing in the same genre in fact.  But it's... different, and you can tell.

With MLP, we have the added complication of a toy company ready to swoop in and insist on things brought about by (ominous music) Marketing Decisions.  Things like, "Hey is there a way we can include the Pony toys made out of that weird transparent plastic in the show?  Maybe they could have their own kingdom and Princess!"  Or, "The fans loved Discord so let's give them a whole episode full of him where they make him a good guy!  You know, because changing the alignment of a villain who is largely defined by how few f***s he gives never backfires ever!"

And then, there's Princess Twilight.

Hey, remember when we were so excited that winged unicorns were going to be an actual thing in My Little Pony?  Yeah...

Man, what can you say about Princess Twilight?  She very nicely encapsulates everything disappointing about this latest season, doesn't she?  It's a hell of an odd choice, and the whole episode, which could have standed to be twice as long, felt for all the world like a series -not season but series- finale to me.  This isn't Sweetie-Bell getting her Cutie Mark, this is a total upending of the series' main characters' status quo.  I can't see how the series is going to recover from this, though I have an awful suspicion that maybe everyone in the main cast will switch species by the time this is over.  What's next?  Are they going to bring back humans to the show?

(There is a long and awkward pause...)

Oh, Hasbro.  What have you done?  WHAT HAVE YOU DONE?!?

In some ways, it will be fascinating to see where the series and the fandom go from here.  I'm not sure what else to add so I'll open the floor to (heavily moderated.  Repeat: I "love" living in a world where the comments of a woman who has been collecting these damn things since she was about five might be considered incendiary) discussion in the comments.

-----

In the meantime, some major news which still strikes me as a huge bummer: Art Evolved will no longer be holding periodic themed galleries.  The good news is that they will still have one last gallery, with art due on June first, and they're planning on going out with a bang.  The theme is Tyrannosaurs.  Aw yeah.

-----

Art of the Day!  Oh, for the days of having to learn how to set the VCR to catch the conclusions of multi-part episodes and playground-grief-causing animation mistakes...



Wednesday, January 2, 2013

In Which Trish *Finally* Gets a Look at 3/4ths of "Dinosaur Revolution"!

Yes, I finally saw it.  Out of the kindness of the YouTube elves, since there is not one scrap of evidence that this miniseries will be available in it's original televised form on DVD in America anytime soon.  And with the second episode completely missing, that single episode having been deleted by Discovery Networks (because content providers cracking down on the internet know no logic).  So here are my thoughts, well over a year after anyone could possibly care!  Huzzah and Happy New Year!

Bit of background, first.  The story of "Dinosaur Revolution" (also known by the less-confounding title, "Reign of the Dinosaurs") begins several years ago when a teaser image of concept art appeared on the Internet.  (This was occasionally credited to Pixar, possibly having been conflated with contemporary teaser art from "The Good Dinosaur".)  At the time, we were given sky-high promises about the upcoming miniseries.  Most exciting among these were the promise that this would be a narrative dinosaur film with no dialogue or vocal narration at all, that the dinosaurs would be the most scientifically accurate animals to date, and that noted paleoartists and animators would be contributing to the project.  It was not referred to as a serious documentary, but would instead be a series of short animated vignettes of life in the Mesozoic.  One of the earliest previews shows what they initially intended for the series.

In short, this sounded like the dinosaur animation that I'd been longing for since, like, forever.  And that I'm still longing for because "Dinosaur Revolution" isn't it.

But it comes really damn close to it.  A lot of what's bad about the miniseries has been blamed on executive meddling, so let's tackle the not-so-good parts of "Dinosaur Revolution" first.

There are, to be sure, segments with excellent animation.  There are also segments with very sloppy animation, with "floaty" physics and wonky walk-cycles, and the inconsistency can get jarring.  I didn't have as much of a problem with the more stylized aspects of the series that most people did, looking back at reviews of the series from the time.  That said, there were a couple of scenes that had me thinking, "really?"  Most of them have to do with the non-dinosaur characters, like the weirdly dolphin-like Mosasaur and the pterosaur mother with her babies...  Hey, you know that scene in "The Land Before Time" with the cute baby pterosaurs going after the one berry?  There's a scene in "Dinosaur Revolution" that is the exact diametric opposite of it. <8(

The narration is oftentimes just awful, sounding exactly like what you'd imagine the end-result of a long string of bad decisions from wimpy execs would.  It just keeps showing up again and again, stating the stunningly obvious, and getting in the way right when I was most enthralled with the visuals.

Then you have the segments where Coachella Tupac hologram scientists talk about *sort-of* sciencey-stuff in a very fake looking science lab set.  Oh dear, these were indeed very silly.  Now, it's always fun to have Scott Sampson talk about dinosaurs in a television show, and I like how they interviewed Scott Hartman.  It would have been very nice to have the show's contributors talk about their reasoning behind the animated sequences after each episode.  Apparently, this was the original plan, but the network caved and decided to throw the interviews randomly in during the show itself.  Like the narration, these segments just interrupt the dinosaurs we're here to see.

There's also that damned strange ending.  Spoilertext: You cry for the mother Troodon desperately trying to save her last egg. But then, there is flash-forward to modern times with some incredibly sh*ttily animated birds to show that all is well and some Maniraptors made it! Man, if they had just stopped there it'd be fine. But they end on a very, very different note - and you cry again.

The other big point of contention people had with "Dinosaur Revolution" has to do with the tone.  Discovery shot itself in the foot advertising this as a straight, serious documentary.  Indeed, it feels as though they took the animated segments, which are as a whole essentially like a more rigorously accurate original "The Land Before Time", and tried to force them into a dead-serious science documentary by adding the narration and interview segments.  The end result is jarring, to say the least.

So, basically, the main criticisms I have with "Dinosaur Revolution" have to do with what it isn't, and what the networks tried to force it to be.  Ignoring all that, there is a lot to love in the miniseries.

First off, these animated dinosaurs look absolutely fantastic.  I dare say they may be the most believable CGI creatures this side of "District 9" - when the animation is at it's best, at least.  I love how they're allowed to look and behave much stranger then we're used to seeing in this kind of CGI dinosaur series.  It's not always realistic but it's believable, and that's what counts.

Most significantly, in many ways, "Dinosaur Revolution" reminded me of the "a paleoartist is going to inevitably be wrong about what dinosaurs really looked like anyway, so why be wrong and boring?" philosophy of Brian Engh's astonishing Sauroposeidon illustration.  Or the illustrations in All Yesterdays, come to think of it.  It's mind-blowing at times, and I hope the re-edit of the miniseries (with the facepalm-worthy title, "Dinotasia") is closer to the original vision for the series.

Overall, what I liked in "Dinosaur Revolution", I liked a lot.  I'll try to ignore the rest. 

-----

Sketch of the Day!  The very first entry in Sketch of the Day 2013!  A pretty Troll bride-to-be and the difference between the "Jurassic Park" and "Dinosaur Revolution" T. rexes.

1.1.13 Sketchbook Page

Thursday, March 29, 2012

Tales from the Dork Age - Thoughts on "Dream On, Silly Dreamer"

It is weird as hell that "Dream On, Silly Dreamer" (available through the official website or for around two dollars on iTunes) is more accessible than "The Sweatbox" since it is, by a country mile, the more damning Disney animation documentary.

This is the tale of the events leading up to what could be called The Day The Magic Died. March 25, 2002, that awful day when over a thousand Disney animation artists were fired. This led to the shutdown of the auxiliary animation studios, and to the very darkest period in Disney animation history.

In "Dream On", this story is told through the words of those then-freshly fired animators.


As you might imagine, this film will probably make you very depressed.

However, it's fascinating to hear the story of the rise and fall of Disney animation during this time period from the artists who lived to tell about it. We don't see much in terms of animation art, and the archival footage is essentially the same as in "Waking Sleeping Beauty" (and presented in a grainy, blurry state at that), but the stories the animators tell are enthralling and heartbreaking. If you were disappointed that we do not hear much from Andreas Deja in "The Sweatbox", I can assure you he has a lot to say here.

We learn that one of my longtime suspicions is indeed true: the astonishing success of "The Lion King" spoiled the hell out of everyone involved in Disney animation. In that moment, the business side of Disney animation took over the art side, executives became ravenously greedy, and everyone contracted a fatal case of Small Name, Big Ego. From then on, the reputation of Disney films began to suffer, as the Disney name was suddenly associated with Lucas-level marketing orgies (does anyone want a Quasimodo stuffed doll?), an emphasis on spectacle over story and character, and -worst of all- a seemingly endless stream of cheap direct-to-video sequels.
The film gives us a better name for the Dork Age: the Greed Age.

Ultimately, the executives start to assume that there is no future for hand-drawn animation because of the higher box office numbers achieved by PIXAR films. While this joke made more sense in the age of "Chicken Little" and "Dinosaur", I still secretly want the executives who came to this conclusion to write a five-page essay entitled "Why PIXAR's Scripts Don't Suck".

The film has a sobering take-away message: Animation is not easy. Animation is really freakin' hard. Indeed, being an artist is a hell of a career choice because half the time people think what you do is some kind of magic trick or special effect and the other half people wonder why you don't have a real job. Furthermore, it's physically and emotionally draining. The good old "actor with a pencil" metaphor is brought out again but no actor has ever been asked to work for twelve hours straight staying in character the entire time and exercising only one set of easily-fatigued muscles.

The film ends on a colossal downer, with the interviewees facing an uncertain future and Disney's reputation squarely in the crapper. Oddly, the official companion website has no updates on any of the artists interviewed, so their fate largely remains a mystery. Overall, t
he film is a fascinating look into a very strange period of animation history.

-----

In happier animation news. Hey, does anyone remember that weird "Guardians of Childhood" thing William Joyce and Guillermo Del Toro and Leonardo DiCaprio of all three people were working on together that involved a whole bunch of childhood folklore characters saving the world or something equally ridiculous?

Yeah. Well, the trailer's out and it turns out that the crazy-sounding project looks, and I apologize in advance for this mom, f***ing AMAZING:



I believe I will now trust these guys with anything. My God, the hummingbird-like fairies! The Ghibli tributes conjured by the Sandman! TATTOOED BADASS SIBERIAN SANTA CLAUS!!!


-----

Sketch of the Day! I have drawn for you less popular folklore characters!

2.26.12 - Less Popular Mythical Beasts

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

In Which, By Some Miracle, Trish Watches "The Sweatbox"

It was a huge weekend for animation news, wasn't it? Glen Keane, one of my biggest influences, resigned after 37 years(!?!) at Disney. The initial episodes of "The Legend of Korra" (the sequel series to the outstanding "Avatar: The Last Airbender") were temporarily released a little early.

And, what else what else? It was kinda important... Oh yeah! "The Sweatbox" appeared online for a while.

Ah, "
The Sweatbox", the legendary documentary made by Trudie Styler that chronicles the very very strange evolution of "The Emperor's New Groove". I'd heard about it, I'd read about it, and I was pretty sure I'd never get to see it. I think the film was screened in two, if even that, film festivals years ago and hasn't resurfaced in any meaningful way since, most likely because Disney owns the rights to the documentary and the executives did not enjoy the way they were portrayed in it.

Well it appears as though by some completely random chance, an early cut of "The Sweatbox" surfaced in various places online. I learned about this while reading an animation thread on a certain website last Thursday. "Screw you, original afternoon plans," I said and dropped everything to watch the workprint immediately.

I was actually afraid that it would be taken down as I was watching, so I didn't want to risk waiting. It has since been deleted from YouTube, but the Internet never forgets and there's a
very slight chance that it's still available somewhere out there. It was well worth a look just to satisfy my curiosity about the thing.



Now a very, very small portion of the film was posted over the summer and is still available (see above). It actually gives you an excellent idea of the documentary as a whole. First of all, it's not at all the muckraking clusterf*** I was led to expect after all these years. As a matter of fact, it's actually very sympathetic towards the film crew. If there was more aggressive dissent between the film crew and the executives, it's not onscreen. Heck, the executives don't even come across as that bad; they really only just admit that the original version of the film isn't working. There's not a lot of screaming and swearing, but there's a lot of shrugging and statements of "Oh well, them's the breaks."

The story is, naturally, mostly told from Sting's point of view and therefore covers how he and the other musicians and composers had to radically alter the film's music as it went under several dramatic tonal changes. I hate to say it, but this part of the story was by far the least interesting. We do get to see a lot of the animation art from
"Kingdom of the Sun," the movie that mutated into "Emperor." This includes the brilliant Yzma villain song posted above and an animatic for another completely deleted song. Mostly there's storyboards, animatics, story sequences that were completely cut, and early character designs. These last two things are especially fascinating, and I really wish that much more time was spent on them.

We learn that Pacha was originally a
completely different character, much younger and voiced by Owen Wilson. He would have been involved in a sort of "Prince and the Pauper" subplot, switching places with the transformed Emperor... Manco (stop laughing, Japan). There was a very very strange little character essentially in Kronk's role; a talking Olmec statue who sang a song about why humans can't be more like rocks. Yeah. And there was a princess character(?!?) who falls for Pacha(!?!?!) and sings the aforementioned deleted love song with him(?!?!?!?) while he is taking the Emperor's place.

Now it turns out that the tone of "Kingdom" wasn't as dreadfully serious as I'd been led to believe. It looks like the film had two very different supervisors, one of whom wanted a serious big damn epic, and the other wanted more humor. Eventually the humorous director got to take over the project entirely, and we got "The Emperor's New Groove". Sting was called -while on tour, which was just a little bit problematic for him- to write new songs for the new version of the film and from what "The Sweatbox" shows us, these are essentially the ones we hear in the final film. Yes, including "My Funny Friend and Me", which I always assumed was a holdover from "Kingdom of the Sun" and seems to come from yet another completely different film entirely. The sadder story is that of Andreas Deja, who is interviewed twice (*sigh*, only twice): once as he is working on the earlier version of Yzma and again after he's essentially dropped from the project.

Hanging over the documentary is, of course, the fact that "Emperor's New Groove" actually did eventually get made and released (with a lot of the discarded songs on the soundtrack yet), and is, especially given it's strange history, really good. So while "The Sweatbox" isn't like the "Lost in LaMancha" of animation, it's an entertaining look behind the scenes of an animated film, which is a rare treat indeed. I still wish Disney would let it be officially released so that more fans could finally satisfy their curiosity about it.

-----

Sketch of the Day!

Some of these character designs might have been for the project I had to put on hold when I heard I could finally watch "The Sweatbox":

3.12.12 - Random Character Ideas

Tuesday, May 25, 2010

Top Five Unresolved Plot Points from... "Avatar: the Last Airbender".

I know, but It's going to take me a while to process the "Lost" finale. (Exceedingly minor spoilers in that link.)

Fun in the Backyard! - Episode 23

So here's a rundown of mysteriously abandoned characters and plotlines from another television series my entire family was in total agreement of and that none of us wanted to end. Supposedly, the producers are working on some feature-length direct-to-DVD sequels. Hopefully, these will be at least be addressed if not fully wrapped up.
Mind you, I love the hell out of this series. Unfortunately, this kind of thing kinda comes with the territory when the network decides that they're only going to give you half a season to wrap everything up in your epic fantasy series. Wah.
These are in no particular order:

The White Lotus Society
They built this up so badly in the final season. This secret society made up mostly of cool older characters did show up in the finale, but their previous mentions in the series were so mysterious. So this isn't technically a dropped plot, but it's one of those things, like the Blue Spirit and Combustion Man and, infamously, Uncle Iroh's jailbreak, that we expected to have a much, much bigger payoff

Toph's Family
For a lot of people, this is one of the big ones. So Toph is a character who joins the main cast early in the second season, and she quickly becomes one of the best characters in the show. Thing is, she is a runaway; she went off on her adventures with Aang and company without saying anything to her rich parents. In the *final season* she decides to send a message to her mom to let her know she's alive. This is never again acknowledged. Heck, we don't even know if Toph's family received the message, as it was sent via Sokka's messenger hawk. And since I brought Hawkie up, that leads us naturally to...

Dropped Characters
This is a series with loads and loads of characters. Not all of them are going to appear more than once, but there were several who seemed to have been developed enough that they were going to have larger roles later on. Among them are Aang's mentor Guru Pathik, eerie spirit Koh the Face-Stealer, the aforementioned Hawkie, and probably many more that I can't remember right now. But the big one here deserves her own entry:

OK, So What's the Deal With Ursa?
She is Zuko and Azula's mother. She has been missing, presumed dead, since before the series began. There is a great deal of evidence that she's still alive in the series, she appears -as a hallucination- in one of the final episodes, and in the very last episode it is revealed that she is indeed alive. It is wildly speculated that the first DTV film will focus on her somehow.

And Finally, What's the Deal With Bosco the Bear?
Katara: (reading a newspaper) "The king's having a party tonight for his pet bear!"
Aang: "You mean platypus-bear?"
Katara: "No, it just says, 'bear.'"
Sokka: "Certainly you mean his pet skunk-bear?"
Toph: "Or his armadillo-bear?"
Aang: "Gopher-bear?"
Katara: "Just... 'bear.'"
(There is a pregnant pause.)
Toph: "This place is
weird."
That dialogue pretty much speaks for itself. Bosco is the pet bear of the Earth King and he is one of the odd little non sequiters in the show that was treated as kind of a joke for those of us who were paying attention. However, this "joke" has some pretty weird implications for the Avatar universe. All of the non-supernatural animals seen in "Avatar" are weird hybrids, very likely in tribute to "Dungeons and Dragons" (Owlbears anyone?) Taking for granted that the very act of calling a Turtleduck a Turtleduck is a translation convention and normal animals like Bosko are unknown, if Wuzzles/Firffels are normal for the Avatar world then...?

----

Totally unrelated, but happy Towel Day!!!
Also, here's
a nifty interview with Don Hahn via the wonderful /Filmcast.
Also via /Film, a preview of illustrations for Josh Cooley's upcoming book Movies R Fun! Oh good lord, they are beautiful
ALSO also via /Film, our first look at fully-rendered CGI Wile E. Coyote in Three-Effin-Dee. Dear reader, you can probably guess with 99% accuracy how I feel about this...


----

Sketch of the day!
Let's consider this a teaser for the next post:

5.17.10 - Kissguanodon

Friday, January 29, 2010

In which I feel bad for not telling more people to watch "Dollhouse"

Warning: some Nerd Rage ahead.
Tonight marks the end of Joss Whedon's "Dollhouse", a series that flew under the radar of nearly anyone who'd like it best. We've had a lot of excellent speculative fiction television series the past few years and this could have easily turned into a classic. Admittedly, the first five episodes or so were slow, slow, slow and it took several months for the show to find it's voice, but once it did (round about Episode ten I'd say), it did what only the ballsiest speculative fiction does: It explored every last disturbing implication of it's fantastic premise. Sadly, Whedon only had a few episodes, mostly in the second season, to fully explore that premise without having to keep the advertisers and network happy.
The history of this series has been... interesting to say the least. Executive Meddling (take a shot) plagued the first half of the first season, but then Joss was allowed to do his own thing for the second half. Certainly, all the while the traumatic experience of Fox's treatment of "Firefly" was hanging over his head. So he came up with an episode called "Epitaph 1" that could act as an ending for the series as a whole *or* a good cliffhanger for the first season if the series miraculously didn't get canceled. Sure enough, the series miraculously did not get canceled -- but Fox decided not to air "Epitaph 1", opting to end the season on a comparatively cheerier note. So the second season went ahead business as usual as if that episode never existed.
And then Fox decided to cancel "Dollhouse" anyway. That's hubris for you.
So in the past month's worth of episodes or so, Joss Whedon has been doing an excellent job of building towards the events portrayed in "Epitaph 1" so that he can use it as the first half of a two-part final episode arc. 

Which would be awesome, except Fox *still* isn't going to air it, so good luck understanding what's going on in the series finale.


By the way, "Dollhouse" gets canceled and yet Seth MacFarlane is apparently getting a fourth Illustrated Radio series. Oh yeah, I went there.
Dammit, is it February 2nd yet?

----

In happier news, it is Draw a Dinosaur Day! I am probably drawing one right now and will post it here when I'm finished! Until then, here's the Singing Tyrannosaurus:
The Singing Tyrannosaurus
EDIT: The Singing Tyrannosaurus stays but here is the link to my entry in the Draw A Dinosaur Day pool. I submitted today's Sketchbook page.


----
Feederwatch Friday!
Sharp-shinned Hawk 1 (Just hung out in the neighbor's lilacs. Chickadees were not one bit happy about this.)
Rock Pigeon 4
Mourning Dove 2
Downy Woodpecker 1
Black-capped Chickadee 2
White-breasted Nuthatch 2
House Sparrow 25

Another scary storm on Monday, this time of the soggier variety thanks to unseasonable warmth. I could hardly see the birds, much less count them.

But count them I did. For the science!

Tuesday, August 4, 2009

A Crazy Theory involving "G-Force" and Barlowe's Expedition

NOTE: The following is inspired and elaborated from a brief conversation I had under the Onion AV Club interview with Grant Morrison. (And incidentally, the Clubbers did a wonderful series of interviews with writers and illustrators leading up to Comic-Con International. Check 'em out. The Seth on Classic Illustrators feature is already becoming a bit notorious.)
There is a rumor I have heard among my fellow Wayne D. Barlowe fans. It holds that his dense, strange, beautiful, and wildly imaginative illustrated science-fiction novel Expedition was optioned as a film long, long ago. If you're familiar with the book, you know that this would be sort of like basing a film on a Peterson Field Guide.
(Which is, incidentally, a hilarious idea and I will offer myself as a creature design/concept artist Pro Bono to any filmmaker friends who feel themselves up to the challenge.)

The rumor goes on to say that, after years in development limbo and lots and lot
s of executive meddling (our favorite thing), Expedition finally arrived in theaters in the form of, err, this:



Now, on the one hand, I have never really seen any solid evidence to support this Expedition --> "Evolution" theory. The only real clues are a vague reference to the original script being a very dark, serious sci-fi film at IMDB.com, and some of the background creatures in the film (visible in the trailer at around the twenty and thirty second marks) who have a distinctly
Barlowe-esque look.
But on the other, much larger hand (did I ever tell you I am actually a character in a Michel Gondry dream sequence?), I am cynical enough to believe that absolutely anything is possible in the magical world of adaptation decay. I am sure that we all know that illustrated books (especially picture books and comic books) are hit especially hard by adaptation decay. Three words: "L.X.G." (shudders...)

So how does this relate to "Not Another CGI Rodent Movie" "G-Force"? Well, a fellow at the aforementioned Onion AV Club by the handle of Penguin had a theory that, in light of the Expedition --> "Evolution" rumor, might just be possible. Here it is:
"G-Force" = Years in Development Limbo (Executive Meddling + Adaptation Decay) + We3

----

Time for happier news: Do you like fantastic fiction? Are you a writer? Do you enjoy nice things? There are two big damn conventions you can attend this coming weekend! If you are in Montreal, you should attend WorldCon (coffee with Neil Gaiman!!!), and if you are in Chicago, you should go to Wizard World (the woman [!!??] who played Greedo will be there!) If you are crazy and live equidistant to Chicago and Montreal, why not try to hit up both?
Also, this...

Monday, July 20, 2009

New Episodes of "Futurama" to Have an Entirely Different Cast!?!

The announcement can be read here and the AV Club article that made me aware of this can be read here. It's not like I was planning on watching the new episodes anyway (I was largely disappointed in the movie sequel thingies), but WTF are they thinking?


Update! Um... Vague non-news from Comic-Con, via The Onion AV Club. Apparently, the panelists were not allowed to talk about this.

In less "I need my own Angry Dome"-worthy news, I have contributed a giraffe to the wonderful One Million Giraffes project. You should draw a giraffe and send her in too. Everyone in the world should!

Monday, April 6, 2009

My thoughts on Comicon are coming later.

On a much, much happier note, after quite a long time in development limbo, we're finally getting Spike Jones' "Where the Wild Things Are" film. And if the "Labyrinth"-ish trailer is any indication, we get to look forward to...
...well, basically what a Spike Jones adaptation of a psychologically dense Maurice Sendak picture book should look like. It's not news by now that book adaptations trigger my "prepare to hate it" response, but this looks like it'll be amazing.
By the way, as an illustrator who wrote a thesis on Sendak and his art, it amuses me to no end that the studio executives were having such a hard time with... um, issues that were in the book (and apparently bothering nobody -- but it's a movie now so we can panic now!) for the past forty-six years.😒

(See also the uproar over: "Euw the big blue guy's naked!" "OMG, there's like fifty different endings why didn't the just pick one?" "The Martians are killed by germs? That's stupid! You're stupid!" And on and on. You wonder, sometimes, if people even know what a book *is*.)

Addendum: Read this interview and prepare to be twice as excited. We're finally getting a new children's film that is about something.

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

"What Measure is a Non-Mammal?"

Art first. Click for big:
700.  Stowstorm Silverguts, the Dragon from the alternate cover art of _The Areas of My Expertise_
Some time ago, I brought up the Onion AV Club's interview with David Petersen (Mouse Guard, which I am currently reading and is terrific). In it, he explains that he had written a sweet short story for his wife for their first Valentine's Day together. (This is where you either go "Aww" or "Barf". Or both.) The publishing company decided it would make a terrific children's picture book. All Petersen would have to do is change the whole damn thing.

Executive Meddling, and the various tales of woe associated with such, is a ripe subject for at least a month's worth of blog entries. But what stuck in my craw was the following, almost throw-away line:

"We eventually determined that they'd (the couple in the story) both be rabbits. I was originally going to do both as cardinals, but they said no, we really need something cute and fuzzy. Children don't relate to birds as well." (Emphasis mine.)

Well, readers (both of you), it's Survey Time! How many of you had any problems whatsoever relating to non-mammal animal characters?

Because, and this is just off the top of my head, the publishing company's line of thinking completely discounts things like "The Land Before Time", "Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles" (they had a Token Human Friend, but still), "Finding Nemo", "A Bug's Life", "Happy Feet" (love it or leave it), Donald Duck, Daffy Duck, Tweety, Woody Woodpecker, Heckle and Jeckle, ad infinitum.

I wonder if these are the same people who decided we wouldn't enjoy Disney's "Dinosaur" unless it had some primates for us to relate to...

Feederwatch Wednesday!!!

I'm doing this early to remind everyone that this upcoming weekend is the Great Backyard Bird Count. Participation is considerably easier than Project Feederwatch. This is the first time I'll be participating after forgetting to do so for so long. Good luck, everyone!